-EN FLORIDE, PAS A GAZA-

.

********

J'ai reçu ce document de "Act for America". Et regardez bien, ce n'est pas à Gaza que ça se passe, ce n'est pas au Liban ou au Maroc, ce n'est pas en France, ce n'est pas en Europe ... Non ! C'est ici aux US, ici en Floride. Et ce sont les mêmes ... Ecoutez bien ce qu'ils disent - tellement élémentaire que compréhensible par tout un chacun. C'est une honte !


Act for America :

"... Quand vous visionnerez la video, vous allez voir et entendre des choses qui sont offensantes, profondément dérangeantes, et franchement effrayantes. Vous allez voir des pancartes qui disent : " Envoyez une bombe nucleaire sur Israel". Vous entendrez une femme hurler aux manifestants pro-Israel " Retournez dans les fours !!" Vous entendrez des blasphèmes vulgaires. Au milieu de tout ça, vous verrez un meneur Musulman interviewé, s'exclamant qu'une fois que les gens comprendront vraiment l'Islam ils n'auront aucun autre choix sauf de l'accepter.
Et souvenez-vous que cette escalade de violence a commencé avec la rupture du cessez-le-feu du Hamas et les centaines de rockets lancées sur les quartiers résidentiels d'Israel. Ceci n'est pas aussi clair quand on se refère aux "informations" de la semaine dernière. Israël a répondu pour se défendre elle-même comme elle avait le droit de le faire."

****************

I received this document from "Act for America". And take a good look at it for this does not occur in Gaza this is not in Lebanon or Morocco, this is neither in France nor in Europe … NO ! This is right here in the US, right in Florida. And they are all the same … Listen carefully to what they say - it's so primitive, it's comprehensible by everyone). What a shame !

Act for America :

" ... When you watch the video you’ll see and hear things that are offensive, deeply disturbing, and, frankly, frightening. You’ll see signs that say “Nuke Israel.” You’ll hear a woman yell at pro-Israel demonstrators, “Go back to the ovens !!” You’ll hear vulgar profanities. In the midst of all of this you will see a Muslim leader at the demonstration being interviewed exclaiming that once people really understand Islam they will have “no choice” but to accept it.

And remember that this latest round of violence began with Hamas breaking the cease-fire and launching hundreds of rockets into residential areas of Israel. That’s not very clear from many of the news reports of the past week. Israel has responded to defend itself, as it has every right to do."

**************************

-Nous sommes tous des Israeliens-

.















**********

Excellent article de Guy Millière sur le site "Les 4 Vérités" sur la situation en Israel.

Israël loin des mythes de la presse européenne

Israel
Il faut voyager. Rien ne remplace le contact direct avec une réalité où se mêlent souvent une infinité de facteurs que la lecture de textes ne peut restituer. J’ai plusieurs fois fait le tour du monde. J’ai traversé des contrées que je ne pourrais plus traverser aujourd’hui, Iran ou Afghanistan, par exemple. Mes goûts personnels m’ont souvent conduit aux États-Unis où, malgré l’arrivée au pouvoir de Barack Obama, je retournerai.

Je ne reste pas longtemps dans les zones bobos, car je sais à satiété comment on y vit, comment on y pense et, très vite, le trop plein m’atteint, et avec lui une forme de nausée. Malgré les divergences, j’ai des amis de trente ans à New York et à San Francisco. Quand je les vois, j’essaie de parler d’autre chose que de politique, d’économie ou de géopolitique ou, si le sujet vient dans la conversation, je me garde de les contredire, sachant que je perdrais mon temps. Je m’efforce de voir ce qu’il y a en eux de bon et d’humain, malgré tout. Puis je pars vers l’Amérique intérieure, en laquelle je me reconnais davantage.

Je voudrais aller en Israël plus souvent. Mon emploi du temps m’a empêché de m’y rendre depuis plusieurs années. J’y ai passé quelques jours au mois de décembre, invité par André Darmon, directeur d’« Israël magazine » pour des conférences. Au vu de l’actualité immédiate, je pense utile d’en parler ici. J’ai retrouvé en Israël une société plus moderne encore que celle que j’avais quittée lors de mon dernier séjour. Comme je l’ai dit à mes interlocuteurs, les proximités entre Israël et les États-Unis sont bien plus grandes que celles entre Israël et n’importe quel pays d’Europe, et je continue à trouver admirable ce que le peuple juif a fait, en soixante années, d’un fragment de désert hostile.

Je continue à penser que c’est cela aussi que les peuples arabes et musulmans de la région ne supportent pas et ne comprennent pas, tant la modernité a peu pénétré leur culture et leur mentalité.
Un État juif au milieu du dar el Islam, c’est insupportable.
Un État juif qui accomplit des prouesses à peine concevables, c’est plus insupportable encore.
On confierait à des Israéliens les terres de Syrie, de Jordanie ou du Sinaï égyptien, elles passeraient en quelques années du beige du désert au vert tendre de l’irrigation.
On confierait Israël à des Arabes de la région, le désert ferait rapidement son retour.
C’est particulièrement visible sur les territoires frontaliers. Au Nord, à l’extrême proximité du Liban, là où le Hezbollah réarme sous le regard bienveillant des Nations Unies (j’y étais, côté israélien, assez près pour parler avec des casques bleus et des miliciens antisémites que ne séparaient de moi que deux lignes de barbelés), des arbres fruitiers sont plantés par des Israéliens jusqu’à la ligne de démarcation. Du côté du Hezbollahland, rien, sinon des panneaux à la gloire des « martyrs », c’est-à-dire des assassins.
La route qui sépare la Jordanie de la Judée-Samarie est intéressante. On y roule en sécurité parce qu’Israël veille et, comme aux « checkpoints », cette sécurité va de pair avec peu de contrôles militaires au sol : la surveillance électronique est là, invisible pour qui n’a pas d’intentions criminelles. Les seules maisons salubres sont israéliennes, tandis que les maisons arabes sont des taudis.
Maisons et terres cultivées israéliennes sont des « colonies », écrit-on dans la presse européenne, autrement dit des enclaves de civilisation. La « communauté internationale » voudrait que ces enclaves de civilisation disparaissent et laissent place à rocaille et taudis qui seraient « l’État palestinien » : cela permettrait de garnir les comptes en Suisse de chefs de gangs tels que Mahmoud Abbas. Cela ferait disparaître ces traces, sans doute obscènes pour des yeux décadents, de progrès.

L’étape suivante serait vraisemblablement la submersion d’Israël par la barbarie djihadiste. Israël ne laissera pas faire, comme le montrent les opérations actuelles contre le Hamas à Gaza. Si les peuples arabes de la région n’avaient pas l’esprit détraqué par le fanatisme, ils voudraient une vraie paix pour profiter, par la production et l’échange, de la prospérité créée par Israël. Si les politiciens occidentaux n’avaient pas l’esprit rongé par la lâcheté et la soumission, ils inciteraient eux-mêmes à une évolution en ce sens…
Guy Milliere - Jeudi 01 janvier 2009

****************

******

WE ARE ALL ISRAELI

Excellent article from Guy Milliere, which can be found on Les 4 Verites website, concerning the situation in Israel.

Israel far from the myths of the European press

Israel
One must really travel. Nothing substitutes for the direct contact with reality where an infinity of factors often intermingle, which the mere reading of texts cannot restore. I have travelled around the world several times. I crossed regions which I could not cross any more today, like Iran or Afghanistan, for example. My personal tastes often led me to the United States where, in spite of the come to power of Barack Obama, I will return.

I do not remain a long time in the "bobo" rings because I know more than enough how one lives there, how one thinks there, and very quickly an "overflow" kind of feeling reaches me, and with it a type of nausea. In spite of the differences, I have some thirty year old friends in New York and San Francisco. When I see them, I try to speak about everything except politics, economy or geopolitics. Or, if the subject does come in the conversation, I take care not to contradict them, knowing that I would waste my time. I strive to see what good and human there is in them, despite everything. Then I leave towards inner America, in which I recognize myself more.

I would like to go more often to Israel. My timetable has prevented me from returning there for several years. I just spent a few days there in December, invited to speak at conferences by André Darmon, director of “Israel magazine”. Given the very recent events, I think it's useful to speak about it here. I found in Israel an even more modern society than the one I had left after my last stay. As I said to my interlocutors, the proximities between Israel and the United States are much larger than those between Israel and any country of Europe, and I continue to find admirable what the Jewish people made, in sixty years, out of a fragment of hostile desert.

I continue to think that this is also what the Arab and Moslem people of the area find insufferable and incomprehensible, since so little modernity has penetrated their culture and their mentality.
A Jewish State in the middle of "dar el Islam", is simply unbearable.
A Jewish State which achieves hardly conceivable prowesses, is even more unbearable..

If one would entrust to Israelis the land of Syria, Jordan or the Egyptian Sinai, they would in a few years turn it from the beige of the desert to the tender green of irrigation. If one would entrust Israel to Arabs of the area, the desert would make a quick return.
It is particularly obvious on the territories at the frontier. Up North, with the extreme proximity of Lebanon, where Hezbollah rearms under the benevolent glance of the United Nations (I was there, on the Israeli side, so close I could nearly speak with the blue helmets and the anti-semite militia-men that only two lines of barbed wires separated from me), fruit trees are planted by Israelis to the line of demarcation. On Hezbollah-land, nothing, except billboards to the glory of the “martyrs”, i.e. the assassins.
The road which separates Jordan from Judaea-Samarie is interesting. One can drive there safely because Israel takes care of it and, just as at the “checkpoints”, this safety goes hand in hand with few military controls on the ground: electronic monitoring is everywhere, invisible there for those who have no criminal intentions. The only salubrious houses are Israeli, while the Arab houses are slums. Israeli houses and cultivated grounds are “colonies”, one can read in tge European press, in other words islands of civilization. The “international community” would like to see these enclaves of civilization disappear and leave room to rubble and slums, which would be “the Palestinian State”: that would make it possible to fill the Swiss accounts of gang leaders like Mahmoud Abbas. That would make these traces of progress disappear, undoubtedly obscene for decadent eyes.

The following stage would probably be the immersion of Israel by djihadist cruelty. But Israel will not let this happen, as the current operations against Hamas in Gaza are showing us. If the Arab people of the area did not have their minds unhinged by fanaticism, they would like a true peace, to profit by production and exchange, of the prosperity created by Israel. And if Western politicians did not have their spirit corroded by cowardice and submission, they would themselves encourage an evolution in that direction…
Guy Milliere - Thursday january 1st 2009

**************************

-IRAN : sans commentaires-

IRAN

Pour le plein écran : cliquer sur l'icone en bas à droite de la video Youtube.
To view in full screen mode : just click on the Youtube bottom right icon.




IRAN : no comment

**************************

-Le Troisieme Jihad-

.


Les derniers attentats en Inde, à Bombay, nous rappellent une fois encore à quel point l'islam radical représente pour le monde entier LE danger majeur. Au sein même de l'Amérique, ses forces nocives travaillent dans le but de soumettre un jour cette terre de liberté.

Sur l'excellent site Bivouac-Id, est présentée la version traduite en français, du film évènement "Le troisième Jihad" qui devrait ébranler et pousser à l'action, tous les amoureux de notre chère Liberté et de nos valeurs occidentales.










La seule question à se poser après avoir vu ce document, c'est : "Que FAISONS-NOUS ?"
Comment organiser non seulement la résistance à cet envahisseur qui ne cache pas ses buts, mais surtout quel plan d'action mettre en oeuvre pour activement se lever et s'élever concrètement contre ses desseins ?

OCCIDENT REVEILLE- TOI  !

****************

Wake Up, The West !

The latest terrorist attacks in Mumbai, India, remind us once again how radical islam represents THE major danger to the world. In the very heart of America, its vicious forces are at work with the goal of submitting this country of liberty one day.

The excellent Bivouac-Id website presents us with a French underscored version of the event movie "The Third Jihad", that should shake and bring into action all the defenders and lovers of our dear Freedom and Western values.

The only question remaining after viewing this documentary is : "WHAT DO WE DO ABOUT IT ?"

How do we organize both the resistance to this invader that doesn't even mask its goals, and even more importantly : what action plan can we devise to raise to the combat and counter its goals ?

**************************

-Geert Wilders : FITNA-

Tout est vrai. Aucune image blasphématoire de Mahomet.

Solidarité avec Geert WILDERS

All is true. No blasphemous image of Mohammed.

Solidarity with Geert WILDERS

Fitna sous titre Français geert wilders
Uploaded by Fitna_le_film

***************************

-LE SEUIL CRITIQUE-

.

Excellent et utile article reçu d' "AMERICAN CONGRESS FOR TRUTH"


L'analyse suivante, sur la façon dont l'Islam progresse à l'intérieur d'une autre culture, nous est parvenue par email ce week-end. Alors que nous n'avons pas lu le livre de Peter Hammond : "Esclavage, terrorisme, islam", ce qui suit est apparemment adapté de son livre.

Indépendamment de la source de cette analyse, ses conclusions sont historiquement et empiriquement soutenues. Comme George Santayana a écrit : "Ceux qui n'apprennent pas de l'histoire sont condamnés à la voir se répéter". Concernant l'Islam, nous ne devons pas regarder des centaines d'années en arrière pour apprendre de l'histoire. Tout ce dont nous avons besoin, c'est de regarder ce qui s'est produit en Grande-Bretagne ces trois dernières décennies.

L'Islam n'est pas une religion ni un culte. C'est un système complet, absolu.
L'Islam a des composantes religieuses, légales, politiques, économiques et militaires.
La composante religieuse est une accroche pour les autres composantes.
L' Islamisation se produit quand les musulmans dans un pays sont assez nombreux pour s'agiter et réclamer leurs prétendus "droits religieux."
Quand des sociétés politiquement correctes et culturellement variées, sont d'accord sur les demandes musulmanes "raisonnables" concernant leurs "droits religieux", elles récoltent aussi les autres composantes, en bonus.

Voici comment cela marche (pour les pourcentages, la source : la CIA - The world fact book (2007) -

- Aussi longtemps que la population des musulmans reste autour de 1% dans n'importe quel pays, ils seront considérés en tant que minorité aimant la paix et non comme une menace pour quiconque. En fait, ils peuvent être décrits dans les articles et films, comme étant banalement "colorés".

Les Etats-Unis -- musulmans 1.0%
Australie -- musulmans 1.5%
Canada -- musulmans 1.9%
Chine -- musulmans 1%-2%
Italie -- musulmans 1.5%
Norvège -- musulmans 1.8%

- A 2% et 3% ils commencent à convertir d'autres minorités ethniques et groupes de mécontents, avec un recrutement essentiel dans les prisons et parmi les gangs de quartier :

Le Danemark -- musulmans 2%
Allemagne -- musulmans 3.7%
Royaume-Uni -- musulmans 2.7%
Espagne -- musulmans 4%
Thaïlande -- musulmans 4.6%

- A partir de 5%, ils exercent une influence démesurée, comparée à leur pourcentage dans la population. Ils pousseront à l'introduction de la nourriture halal (préparée selon les normes de l'islam), s'assurant ainsi que les taches de préparation de la nourriture halal soient attribuées à des musulmans. Ils augmenteront la pression sur les chaînes de supermarchés pour la trouver sur leurs étagères -- avec menaces à la clé, si elles ne s'y conforment pas. (Aux Etats-Unis).

La France -- musulmans 8%
Philippines -- musulmans 5%
Suède -- musulmans 5%
Suisse -- musulmans 4.3%
les Pays Bas -- musulmans 5.5%
Trinidad et Tobago -- musulmans 5.8%

A ce seuil, ils s'acharneront à obtenir du gouvernement en place, qu'ils leur permettent de se gérer eux-mêmes sous la Sharia, sous la loi islamique. Le but final de l'Islam n'est pas de convertir le monde mais d'établir la loi de la Sharia sur le monde entier.

- Quand les musulmans atteignent 10% de la population, ils augmenteront l'anarchie comme moyen de se plaindre de leurs conditions (Paris -- voitures qui brûlent). Toute action d'un non-musulman qui offense l'Islam, aura pour conséquences des soulèvements et des menaces (l'affaire des caricatures aux Pays-Bas).

La Guyane -- musulmans 10%
Inde -- musulmans 13.4%
Israel -- musulmans 16%
Kenya -- musulmans 10%
Russie -- musulmans 10-15%

- Après 20%, attendez-vous à des émeutes déclenchées pour un rien, la formation de milice du jihad, des massacres épisodiques et des incendies d'églises et de synagogues :

Ethiopie -- musulmans 32.8%

- A 40% vous trouverez des massacres fréquents, des attaques continuelles de terroristes et la guerre continue des milices :

La Bosnie -- musulmans 40%
Tchad -- musulmans 53.1%
Liban -- les musulmans 59.7%

- A partir de 60% vous pouvez vous attendre à la persécution délibérée des non-croyants et des autres religions, au nettoyage ethnique sporadique (génocide), à l'utilisation de la loi de la Sharia comme arme et le Jizya, l'impôt placé sur les infidèles :

L'Albanie -- musulmans 70%
Malaisie -- musulmans 60.4%
Qatar -- musulmans 77.5%
Soudan -- musulmans 70%

- Au-dessus de 80% l'état se charge des nettoyage ethnique et génocide des non-musulmans :

Le Bangladesh -- musulmans 83%
Egypte -- musulmans 90%
Gaza -- musulmans 98.7%
Indonésie -- musulmans 86.1%
Iran -- musulmans 98%
Irak -- musulmans 97%
Jordanie -- musulmans 92%
Maroc -- musulmans 98.7%
Pakistan -- musulmans 97%
Palestine -- musulmans 99%
Syrie -- musulmans 90%
Tajikistan -- musulmans 90%
Turquie -- musulmans 99.8%
Emirats Arabes Unis -- musulmans 96%

- 100% déclenchera la "paix de Dar-es-Salaam" -- la Maison islamique de la Paix -- C'est supposé être la paix parce que tout un chacun est musulman :

L'Afghanistan -- musulmans 100%
Arabie Saoudite -- musulmans 100%
Somalie -- musulman 100%
Yémen -- musulmans 99.9%

Naturellement, cela n'est pas le cas. Pour satisfaire leur désir de sang, les musulmans commencent alors à s'entretuer pour une multitude de raisons.

"Avant d'avoir neuf ans j'avais appris la Règle de base de la vie arabe. C'était moi contre mon frère, mon frère et moi contre notre père, ma famille contre mes cousins et le clan, le clan contre la tribu, et la tribu contre le monde et nous tous contre l'infidèle.
-- Leon Uris, "Le Haj"

Il est bon de se rappeler que dans beaucoup, beaucoup de pays, tels que la France, les populations musulmanes sont concentrées dans des ghettos basés sur leur appartenance ethnique. Les musulmans ne s'intègrent pas dans la communauté dans son ensemble. Par conséquent, ils exercent plus de puissance que leur moyenne nationale ne semblerait l'indiquer.

Adapté du livre de Dr. Peter Hammond : Esclavage, terrorisme et Islam : Les racines historiques et la menace contemporaine. www.frontline.org.za/books_videos/sti.htm Le congrès américain pour la plage de P.O. Box 6884 le Virginie de vérité, VA 23456 member@americancongressfortruth.org http://www.americancongressfortruth.org/

****************

THE CRITICAL POINT

Excellent and useful article received from "AMERICAN CONGRESS FOR TRUTH" :

The following analysis of how Islam progresses within a culture came to us via email over the weekend. While we have not yet read Peter Hammond’s new book : "Slavery, Terrorism and Islam", the following is reportedly adapted from his book.
Irrespective of the source of this analysis, its conclusions are historically and empirically supported. As George Santayana wrote: "Those who do not learn from history are doomed to repeat it." Regarding Islam, we don’t have to look back hundreds of years to learn from history. All we need do is look at what has happened in Great Britain over the past three decades.


Islam is not a religion nor is it a cult. It is a complete system.
Islam has religious, legal, political, economic and military components. The religious component is a beard for all the other components.
Islamization occurs when there are sufficient Muslims in a country to agitate for their so-called "religious rights."
When politically correct and culturally diverse societies agree to "the reasonable" Muslim demands for their "religious rights," they also get the other components under the table.

Here's how it works (percentages source CIA : The World Fact Book (2007)).

- As long as the Muslim population remains around 1% of any given country, they will be regarded as a peace-loving minority and not as a threat to anyone. In fact, they may be featured in articles and films, stereotyped for their colorful uniqueness :

United States -- Muslim 1.0%
Australia -- Muslim 1.5%
Canada -- Muslim 1.9%
China -- Muslim 1%-2%
Italy -- Muslim 1.5%
Norway -- Muslim 1.8%

- At 2% and 3% they begin to proselytize from other ethnic minorities and disaffected groups with major recruiting from the jails and among street gangs :

Denmark -- Muslim 2%
Germany -- Muslim 3.7%
United Kingdom -- Muslim 2.7%
Spain -- Muslim 4%
Thailand -- Muslim 4.6%

- From 5% on they exercise an inordinate influence in proportion to their percentage of the population.
They will push for the introduction of halal (clean by Islamic standards) food, thereby securing food preparation jobs for Muslims. They will increase pressure on supermarket chains to feature it on their shelves -- along with threats for failure to comply. (United States).

France -- Muslim 8%
Philippines -- Muslim 5%
Sweden -- Muslim 5%
Switzerland -- Muslim 4.3%
The Netherlands -- Muslim 5.5%
Trinidad & Tobago -- Muslim 5.8%

At this point, they will work to get the ruling government to allow them to rule themselves under Sharia, the Islamic Law. The ultimate goal of Islam is not to convert the world but to establish Sharia law over the entire world.

- When Muslims reach 10% of the population, they will increase lawlessness as a means of complaint about their conditions (Paris -- car-burnings). Any non-Muslim action that offends Islam will result in uprisings and threats (Amsterdam -- Mohammed cartoons).

Guyana -- Muslim 10%
India -- Muslim 13.4%
Israel -- Muslim 16%
Kenya -- Muslim 10%
Russia -- Muslim 10-15%

- After reaching 20% expect hair-trigger rioting, jihad militia formations, sporadic killings and church and synagogue burning :

Ethiopia -- Muslim 32.8%

- At 40% you will find widespread massacres, chronic terror attacks and ongoing militia warfare :

Bosnia -- Muslim 40%
Chad -- Muslim 53.1%
Lebanon -- Muslim 59.7%

- From 60% you may expect unfettered persecution of non-believers and other religions, sporadic ethnic cleansing (genocide), use of Sharia Law as a weapon and Jizya, the tax placed on infidels :

Albania -- Muslim 70%
Malaysia -- Muslim 60.4%
Qatar -- Muslim 77.5%
Sudan -- Muslim 70%

- After 80% expect State run ethnic cleansing and genocide :

Bangladesh -- Muslim 83%
Egypt -- Muslim 90%
Gaza -- Muslim 98.7%
Indonesia -- Muslim 86.1%
Iran -- Muslim 98%
Iraq -- Muslim 97%
Jordan -- Muslim 92%
Morocco -- Muslim 98.7%
Pakistan -- Muslim 97%
Palestine -- Muslim 99%
Syria -- Muslim 90%
Tajikistan -- Muslim 90%
Turkey -- Muslim 99.8%
United Arab Emirates -- Muslim 96%

- 100% will usher in the "peace of Dar-es-Salaam" -- the Islamic House of Peace -- there's supposed to be peace because everybody is a Muslim :

Afghanistan -- Muslim 100%
Saudi Arabia -- Muslim 100%
Somalia -- Muslim 100%
Yemen -- Muslim 99.9%

Of course, that's not the case. To satisfy their blood lust, Muslims then start killing each other for a variety of reasons.

"Before I was nine I had learned the basic canon of Arab life. It was me against my brother; me and my brother against our father; my family against my cousins and the clan; the clan against the tribe; and the tribe against the world and all of us against the infidel."
-- Leon Uris, "The Haj"

It is good to remember that in many, many countries, such as France, the Muslim populations are centered around ghettos based on their ethnicity. Muslims do not integrate into the community at large. Therefore, they exercise more power than their national average would indicate.

Adapted from Dr. Peter Hammond's book: "Slavery, Terrorism and Islam" : The Historical Roots and Contemporary Threat.. www.frontline.org.za/books_videos/sti.htm

**************************

-Pire que les islamistes-

Cette affaire commence à faire grand bruit ici et c'est normal. Barack Obama et son pasteur le réverend Jeremiah Wright : drôle de pasteur il est vrai, à la haine de l'Amérique chevillée au coeur, au corps, aux paroles, et aux sermons. C'est effrayant que des gens dans une Eglise puissent subir un tel lavage de cerveau contre l'Amérique.

Il est IMPOSSIBLE qu'Obama n'ait pas été un tant soit peu au courant, tant une haine si envahissante est impossible à cacher : elle imprègne visiblement ce révérend noir. La haine des blancs, la haine des riches, la haine de l'Amérique, la haine de toutes les valeurs qui ont fait et qui font la belle et grande Amérique. Il demande à Dieu la damnation du pays qui lui a permis de faire des études, de s'élever dans l'échelle sociale, de dire ce qu'il veut, de faire ce qu'il désire. Drôle de parole du Christ ... Et au lieu de remercier ce pays pour tout ce qu'il lui a permis de devenir, il crache sa haine de façon effrayante et éhontée.

J'ai déjà rencontré ce même manque de "reconnaissance", chez quelqu'un que j'appréciais pourtant beaucoup et c'est Harry Belafonte. On ne peut pas dire que l'Amérique ait été particulièrement cruelle à son égard et il a la même haine quand il parle de l'Amérique. Ecoeurant !

Et on retrouve ça chez tous les nantis gauchistes de Hollywood qui crachent sur l'Amérique dès qu'ils le peuvent. C'est sûr qu'on ne peut pas demander à des acteurs, en plus, d'être intelligents ... Mais ils distillent tous cette même haine. Si les valeurs américaines, qui leur permettent de vivre en sécurité, de se remplir les poches et de pérorer contre leur pays ne leur plaisent pas, qu'ils s'en aillent, qu'ils aillent dans des pays comme la France. Et pas dans des palaces internationaux ou des quartiers résidentiels. Non la France qui coule, celle de monsieur tout le monde, où des centaines de voitures brûlent tous les soirs, où la liberté de paroles va diminuant, où la pensée unique règne, où l'assassin est mieux considéré que la victime et où l'on peut se faire tuer, mais surtout pas se défendre. Ils verraient à quoi ressemblerait l'Amérique si un jour leurs idées de gauchistes se répandaient assez pour changer leur magnifique pays.

Et la question s'est posée un moment de savoir si Barack Obama était musulman, et avait été éduqué dans une madrassa. avec tous les risques que cela comporte. Eh bien, nul besoin de madrassa, le bon révérend Wright distille les mêmes discours haineux anti-américains que les pires islamistes, les grotesques Ahmadinejad, Kadafi et autres Ben Laden americanophobes. Nul besoin de madrassa pour souhaiter les pires choses à l'Amérique, son gouvernement et ses riches blancs. Que Dieu damne l'Amérique ! souhaite-t-il.

Je crois qu'il est bon de se laver l'esprit de ce bonhomme et de sa haine et de lui répondre simplement, du plus profond du coeur, ceci :

Martina McBride

****************

WORSE THAN ISLAMISTS

This story really starts to make headlines, which is natural. Barack Obama and his Pastor, reverend Jeremiah Wright: strange kind of a Pastor really, with the hatred of America rooted deep in his heart, his body, his words, and his sermons. It's alarming how people in a Church can undergo such a brainwashing against America. It is IMPOSSIBLE that Obama wasn't at least aware of a hatred so invading that it is impossible to hide: it obviously impregnates this black reverend. The hatred of the whites, the hatred of the rich, the hatred of America, the hatred of all the values which have made and still make this beautiful and great America. He asks God to damn the country that enabled him to study, to rise in the social ladder, to say what he wishes and to do what he wants to. Strange Gospel of Christ... And instead of thanking this country for everything it enabled him to become, he spits his hatred in an alarming and shameless way.
I've already witnessed this same lack of "recognition", with somebody I appreciated very much however, I'm talking about Harry Belafonte. One cannot say that America has been particularly cruel towards him and yet he has the same hatred when he speaks about America. Sickening! And one encounters the same with all the wealthy Hollywood leftists who spit on America as soon as they can. Of course, one cannot ask actors to be intelligent too... but they all exude the same hatred. If they hate American values so much, that enable them to live in safety, to fill their pockets and to speechify against their country they detest, let them leave it, let them go to countries like France. But not to an international, luxurious hotel or a residential area. No, the France that sinks, that of Mr and Mrs Everybody, where hundreds of cars burn every night, where freedom of speach is decreasing, where political correctness reigns, where the assassin is more considered than the victim and where you can get killed but have no right to defend yourself. Then they would realize what America would look like one day if their leftist ideas were spread enough to change their splendid country.
The question arose, at one time, if Barack Obama was Muslim, and had been educated in a madrassa, with all the risks that comprises. Well, he didn't need a madrassa since the good reverend Wright distills the same heinous anti-American speeches as the worst islamist ones, the ludicrous Ahmadinejad, Khadafi and other Ben Laden americanophobes. No need for a madrassa to wish the worst things for white America, its government and its rich whities. Let God damn America ! He wishes.
I believe that it is wise to cleanse one's spirit of this bloke and his hatred and to simply answer, from the bottom of my heart, with this : ( Singer : Martina McBride )

**************************

-La sharia ne passera pas chez nous-

.

Excellent article de Daniel Pipes dans FrontPageMagazine, qui nous donne la marche à suivre pour contrer les luttes sournoises que l'islam essaie de mener contre nos chères libertés occidentales.
Ils sont organisés, nos ennemis, mais nous devons nous aussi nous organiser et nous unir pour que des croyances, des comportements et des lois d'un autre âge ne viennent pas supplanter toute la beauté, et la modernité de notre monde de progrès et de liberté.


Petite victoire sur la sharia

By Daniel Pipes
FrontPageMagazine.com Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Les Occidentaux opposés à l'application de la loi islamique (la Shari`a) assistent consternés à l'augmentation de son emprise dans leurs pays - harems de plus en plus admis, leaders religieux soutenant la loi islamique, juges prenant le Coran comme référence, justice rendue par des cours musulmanes non légales et clandestines. Que peut-on faire pour arrêter le progrès de ce système de lois moyen-ageux tellement profondément à l'opposé de la modernité, celui qui opprime les femmes et transforme les non-Musulmans en citoyens de deuxième-classe ?
Une première étape c'est que les Occidentaux montrent un front uni devant la Shari`a. Devant un rejet quasi unanime, les Islamistes reculent.

Un exemple : le recul, la semaine dernière, du Conseil sur les relations Américano-Islamiques (CAIR) dans un conflit concernant les chiens de guides d'aveugle.
Les musulmans considèrent traditionnellement les chiens comme des animaux impurs à éviter. Cette aversion est devenue problématique quand des directeurs de magasin ou des chauffeurs de taxi musulmans ont refusé leur service aux aveugles Occidentaux accompagnés de leurs chiens-guides.
J'ai réuni 15 de ces cas sur mon blog, à "Muslim Taxi Drivers vs. Seeing-Eye Dogs" ( "Chauffeurs de taxi musulmans contre Oeil de remplacement" ) : cinq cas aux Etats-Unis (la Nouvelle-Orléans, Cincinnati, Milwaukee, Brooksville, la Floride), quatre au Canada (Vancouver, deux fois à Edmonton, fort McMurray, Alberta), trois au Royaume-Uni (Cambridge, deux fois à Londres), deux en Australie (Melbourne, Sydney) et un en Norvège (Oslo).
Les articles cités relataient que les chauffeurs de taxi musulmans avaient durement rejeté les clients aveugles, leur hurlant " pas de chien, pas de chien, dehors, dehors", " faites sortir ce chien " et "aucun chiens, aucun chien."
Face à ça, les aveugles s'étaient retrouvés rejetés, humiliés, abandonnés, offensés, ou même blessés, laissés sous la pluie, abandonnés au milieu de nulle part, arrivant en retard à un rendez-vous, ou manquant un vol à l'aéroport.

Graeme Innes est un membre de la Commission australienne des droits de l'homme et il a un chien guide d'aveugle. Innes s'est souvent vu refusé les services des compagnies de chauffeurs de taxi. Les organisations islamistes, ont d'abord répondu à ce problème, en soutenant les chauffeurs de taxi hostiles aux chiens.
L'association des musulmans du Canada a précisé que les musulmans considèrent généralement la salive de chien comme malpropre. CAIR à une occasion avait fait écho de cette assertion, proclamant "que la salive des chiens nuit à la pureté rituelle requise pour la prière." A d'autres occasions, le chef de CAIR, Nihad Awad, a déclaré que les "gens du Moyen-Orient particulièrement... ont été endoctrinés dans la crainte des chiens" et a justifié le rejet d'un chien guide d'aveugle par un chauffeur de taxi, parce qu'il "avait une crainte véritable et qu'il a agi en toute bonne foi. Il a agi selon sa croyance religieuse."

Cependant, quand la police et les cours de justice sont intervenues, les droits légaux des aveugles à leurs besoins fondamentaux et à leur dignité ont presque toujours été reconnues contre l'aversion musulmane des chiens. Le propriétaire ou le chauffeur de taxi musulman ont été invariablement averti, admonesté, rééduqué, menacé, ou même jeté en prison. Le juge qui a qualifié le comportement d'un chauffeur de taxi de "déshonneur total" a parlé pour tous.

CAIR, se rendant compte que son approche avait échoué à la fois dans les cours de justice et dans l'opinion publique, a réagi rapidement et a tourné sa veste. Par une manoeuvre cynique, pour l'exemple, il a mis à disposition gratuitement 300 chauffeurs de taxi à Minneapolis pour les participants à une Conférence de la Fédération Nationale des Aveugles. Pas convaincu par ce stratagème évident, un officiel de la Fédération a répondu : "Nous sommes vraiment mal à l'aise ... avec ces courses gratuites. Nous ne pensons pas que cela règle quoi que ce soit. Nous pensons que les chauffeurs de taxi doivent réaliser que la loi oblige à ne pas rabaisser une personne aveugle."
Et, finalement, la semaine dernière, le Bureau canadien de CAIR a publié un rapport invitant les chauffeurs de taxi musulmans à s'adapter à leurs passagers aveugles, citant un membre du conseil selon lequel l'"Islam accepte les chiens quand ils sont utilisés par des aveugles."

La capitulation de CAIR's contient une leçon importante : - quand les Occidentaux s'entendent largement pour rejeter une loi ou une tradition islamique spécifique et s'unissent contre elle, les Islamistes occidentaux doivent accepter et s'adapter à volonté de la majorité. -
Les chiens guides d'aveugle représentent juste l'un des très nombreux sujets de consensus.
Les autres impliquent des femmes, telles que les maris qui battent leurs femmes, les burqas qui couvrent complètement la tête, la mutilation génitale des filles ( l'excision), et les crimes d'"honneur".
Un Occident uni peut également contraindre les Islamiste à dénoncer leurs positions préférées dans des secteurs tels que l'esclavage et les finances conformes à la Shari'a.

D' autres dérives de comportement ne sont pas (encore) implantées à l'ouest mais règnent dans le monde musulman. Celles-ci incluent de punir une femme pour avoir été violée, l'exploitation des enfants dans les attentats-suicide, et l'exécution pour des crimes tels que se convertir à une autre religion ou abandonner l'Islam, l'adultère, avoir un enfant hors du mariage, ou la sorcellerie. La solidarité occidentale peut gagner des concessions dans ces secteurs là aussi.
Si les Occidentaux s'unissent étroitement, la Shari'a est condamnée. Si nous ne le faisons pas, nous sommes condamnés.

****************

SHARI'A : NO TRESPASSING


Excellent article of Daniel Pipes in FrontPageMagazine, which gives us the procedure to counter the underhand attacks that Islam tries to carry out against our beloved Western freedoms.
Our enemies are organized, but we must also organize ourselves and stand together so that beliefs, behaviors and laws of another age do not come to supplant all the beauty and the modernity of our world of Progress and Freedom .



A Small Victory Over Shari'a

By Daniel Pipes
FrontPageMagazine.com Tuesday, February 19, 2008

Westerners opposed to the application of the Islamic law (the Shari‘a) watch with dismay as it goes from strength to strength in their countries – harems increasingly accepted, a church leader endorsing Islamic law, a judge referring to the Koran, clandestine Muslim courts meting out justice. What can be done to stop the progress of this medieval legal system so deeply at odds with modern life, one that oppresses women and turns non-Muslims into second-class citizens ?
A first step is for Westerners to mount a united front against the Shari‘a. Facing near-unanimous hostility, Islamists back down.

For one example, note the retreat last week by the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) in a dispute concerning guide dogs used by the blind.
Muslims traditionally consider dogs impure animals to be avoided, creating an aversion that becomes problematic when Muslim store-owners or taxi drivers deny service to blind Westerners relying on service dogs. I have collected 15 such cases on my weblog, at "Muslim Taxi Drivers vs. Seeing-Eye Dogs": five from the United States (New Orleans, Cincinnati, Milwaukee, Brooksville, Fl.; Everett, Wash.); four from Canada (Vancouver, twice in Edmonton, Fort McMurray, Alberta); three from the United Kingdom (Cambridge, twice in London); two from Australia (Melbourne, Sydney); and one from Norway (Oslo).

News accounts quote Muslim cabbies rudely rejecting blind would-be passengers, yelling at them, "No dog, No dog, Get out, get out"; "Get that dog out of here"; and "No dogs, no dogs." The blind find themselves rejected, humiliated, abandoned, insulted, or even injured, left in the rain, dropped in the middle of nowhere, made late for an appointment, or caused to miss a flight.

Australian Human Rights Commissioner Graeme Innes and his guide dog. Innes is often denied service by taxi drivers. Islamist organizations initially responded to this problem by supporting anti-canine cabbies.
The Muslim Association of Canada pointed out how Muslims generally regard dog saliva as unclean. CAIR on one occasion echoed this assertion, claiming that "the saliva of dogs invalidates the ritual purity needed for prayer." On another, the head of CAIR, Nihad Awad, declared that "People from the Middle East especially … have been indoctrinated with a kind of fear of dogs" and justified a driver rejecting a guide dog on the grounds that he "has a genuine fear and he acted in good faith. He acted in accordance with his religious beliefs."

However, when the police and the courts are called in, the legal rights of the blind to their basic needs and their dignity almost always trump the Muslim dislike for dogs. The Muslim proprietor or driver invariably finds himself admonished, fined, re-educated, warned, or even jailed. The judge who found a cabby's behavior to be "a total disgrace" spoke for many.

CAIR, realizing that its approach had failed in the courts of both law and of public opinion, suddenly and nimbly switched sides. In a cynical maneuver, for example, it organized 300 cabbies in Minneapolis to provide free rides for participants at a National Federation of the Blind conference. Unconvinced by this obvious ploy, a federation official responded : "We really are uncomfortable … with the offer of getting free rides. We don't think that solves anything. We believe the cabdrivers need to realize that the law says they will not turn down a blind person."
And, finally, last week, the Canadian office of CAIR issued a statement urging Muslims to accommodate blind taxi passengers, quoting a board member that "Islam allows for dogs to be used by the visually impaired."

CAIR's capitulation contains an important lesson : - when Westerners broadly agree on rejecting a specific Islamic law or tradition and unite against it, Western Islamists must adjust to the majority's will.-
Guide dogs for the blind represent just one of many such consensus issues ; others tend to involve women, such as husbands beating wives, the burqa head coverings, female genital mutilation, and "honor" killings.
Western unity can also compel Islamists to denounce their preferred positions in areas such as slavery and Shar‘i-compliant finances.

Other Islam-derived practices do not (yet) exist in the West but do prevail in the Muslim world. These include punishing a woman for being raped, exploiting children as suicide bombers, and executing offenders for such crimes as converting out of Islam, adultery, having a child out of wedlock, or witchcraft. Western solidarity can win concessions in these areas too.
If Westerners stick together, the Shari‘a is doomed. If we do not, we are doomed.

**************************

LES CARICATURES : Le retour ...

.
Et ça y est les fous de dieu ont encore remis ça !
Dans nos pays libres, des humoristes - des Danois - font des caricatures de Mahomet comme ils en font tant, à longueur de journée - tout est bon pour l'inspiration - et des imbéciles, imbus de leur culture néandertalienne et chatouilleux de la susceptibilité, ne font rien moins que préparer un attentat contre le moqueur.

Et ben voilà, pour être gagné c'est gagné ! Tous les journaux, toute la presse, TOUT internet va diffuser cette face de carême prête à exploser. Nous sommes LIBRES. Et solidaires dans la liberté.
Eh oui messieurs les stupides, nous sommes en Occident, nous vivons libres de pensées, de paroles et d'actions, dans la limite de nos lois occidentales et pas de la charia ...
Si ça ne vous plait pas, fermez les yeux, fermez les journaux, ne sortez plus, n'allez plus sur internet, ou retournez sur les terres d'islam où les Chrétiens à l'heure actuelle n'ont guère droit de cité et certains mêmes finissent bien mal ...

SOLIDARITE avec les caricaturistes Danois : vous avez fait votre métier librement, la charia ne passera pas !

****************

CARICATURES : THE COME-BACK

And here they go again, the mads of God !
In our free countries, several humorists - Danes actually - draw caricatures of Mahomet as they do all day long - every subject is good for inspiration - and some morons, proud of their neandertalistic culture and itchy because of their susceptibility, don't do anything less than organizing an attack to assasinate those who mock them.
Well well well ... they lost, big time ! As a reaction, all the newspapers, all the press, ALL of internet will display the dismal face, about to explode. We are FREE. And we all stand together in freedom.
Oh yes, stupid ones, we are in the western world, we live our lives in freedom of thought, of speech and action, within the limits of our Western laws - not the charia... If that's not to your liking, just close your eyes, close your newspapers, don't go out, don't go on the Internet anymore, return to the grounds of Islam where Christians have no right to be at the present time and some even end up their lifes in an afwul way ...

SOLIDARITY with the Danish caricaturists : you carried out your craft freely, and charia will not pass !

**************************

ISLAM IN THE WEST

BEHAVIOUR ETIQUETTE FOR THE MODERATE MUSLIM

in order to be accepted and acceptable on Christian ground

*************************************

Consider on the one hand all the questions arising from the integration of large muslim masses in France and Europe, and the subsequent difficulties that ensue. On the other hand, envision a recent interview of a muslim woman on Fox news, wearing her islamic scarf quite obviously and demanding, loud and clear, quite cleverly by the way, in front of my dear Bill O'Reilly, some additional acommodations "due" to muslims in order for them to practise their religion. This has made me reflect and ask myself some questions :

- How are so-called moderate muslims doing, when they only represent a VERY SMALL COMMUNITY in a western country, I mean a country with a western civilization and a christian religion ?

- How do they live ? How do they practise their religion ?

ANSWER : We do not see them, nor hear them, they create no turmoil, they are embedded in the population. They live and probably follow the precepts of their religion without anyone even noticing.
No difference with other religious group.

And this should become THE modele, and I would even say the absolute modele of muslim behaviour in our christian lands.
And I really do think that herein lies the key factor regarding our possibilities and our limits, as western countries, to border on or to cohabit with muslims can be found AT THAT POINT EXACTLY and nowhere else.

However, this is not what happens. And why ?

- On the one hand, we have a religion with an expansionist and conquering goal. Nobody will contradict me if I state that "basic" islam - and not only islamism - has one goal : spreading itself, vanquishing, and thus in the end establishing itself instead of the other religions. Whatever the means used !
- On the other hand, our western countries where those muslims come to live, United States, Europe, Canada, Australia ... are traditionnally Chistian countries.

- On the one side, in muslim countries, it is obvious that islam not only implies and imposes precepts for life but also intermingles with the political system itself, with the "charia" becoming the law for every muslim.
There, religion, foundation of private, public and political life itself invades all and search to expand EVERYWHERE. Proselyte by definition
- On the western side, the Christian countries are endowed with very specific values, like morals, frankness, respect for life, love of others, progress ... etc. And on these christian values, democratic and republican values have been grafted much more recently, all consistent with christian values. But religion isn't ruling our countries.

And what happens as soon as muslims reach an important number - I would even say a sufficient number ?

As soon as critical mass is reached to start occupying the terrain, the physical, visual, sound, media and other spaces ( all means being used ), one starts to notice an extremely important sign that one must be able to disclose, to be aware of in order to be able to thwart it. And this essential and important sign is DEMANDS.

More and more numerous they tend to change our traditional values to impose their own on us.
At that point : WARNING - DANGER !

THE DEMANDS

They are of different kinds but all depend on a first magician's trick :

The freedom of practising one's religion for some, becomes the DUTY for all the others .

Because EXPOSED practice of islam is a basic way to occupy the ground. Whatever the consequences may be, even if it's to the detriment of the customs, habits, conventions and traditions of the local, basic and major populations of our free countries.

No problem ! Islam uses the freedom of our countries by drawing on all the possible arsenal that our dearly gained liberties give them the possibility to do.

This finally brings about an islam that develops, grows and multiplies itself quietly on the fertile compost of our liberties, but - for there is a but - : our own freedom to be hindered or chocked by certain practices of conquering islam is completely conjured away, denied. It becomes a mere background and this freedom to feel offended by islam, which is also one of our fundamental rights, diminishes and melts like snow in the sun little by little and unnoticed.

But what is really happening ?

- Wether we like it or not, we begin to notice the appearance of all the external signs of the muslim faith. Right from the start we are forced to view muslim women with -at first- a scarf on their heads, which becomes slightly larger and longer to finally completely cover their face ... These are all HIGHLY VISIBLE signs of adherence to islam ( and a very powerful symbol of the obligation for women to hide, to globally remain pure and not represent any temptation for men : in our free countries that intent to remain so, women are not treated that way and that is nobody else's business, after all, many of our dearly liberties having been gained at a high cost ... )

Why would our freedom to not have to look at these symbols of women that we do not recognize as belonging to our western values, not be recognized ?

We are allowed to be schocked by these obscurantism ways.

- Wether we like it or not, demands for worship or praying places, foot bathing, or the possibility to pray in the middle of the street is another urgent muslim demand. When entire streets in Marseille ( a city of the South of France ) are filled with muslims with their buttocks up in the air, busy praying in direction of Mecca, I'm sorry but that's spectacle that might not be what christians want to see the most. All these people, when they exist in small numbers, do not wash their feet on their job site, and do not pray with their bottocks up in the air, in the middle of the street. They wash their feet but at home. They pray but at home. Why then, when they become more numerous, do they suddenly feel the urge to pray out of their homes, to show they are praying ?

And why should our FREEDOM to not be bothered by this behaviour - that in no way corresponds to whatsoever in our culture, our habits, our traditions - not be as important as their RIGHT to practise ?

- Wether we like it or not, demands in France have started to appear concerning special operating hours of public spaces ( like swimming pools and other ), reserved for women. Why would something that was very costly to gain, i.e. the equality of treatment for both genders, be offered to one particular minority only ? What do men do if they want to swim at that time ? For a religious reason, the social rights of all citizen are being denigrated.

Freedom for the autochtons, where have you gone ? And for the RIGHTS of one and only religion, always the same one !

- Wether we like it or not, there are demands for female physicians reserved for female patients, and male physicians for men patients only. Why not truncated teachings ? what else is next ? Why not diplomas for men and diplomas for women too ?

In France, male physicians who treat female muslims patients are often threatened and risk dying at the hand of muslim husbands enraged because the physician dared touch their wife.

Where's our freedom in all that ? All for a religion so oppressive and that wants to dominate.Thus die our liberties a bit more.

- Wether we like it or not, demands have been made in France for the prohibition of ( females ) medical students to treat male patients : thus a man needing emergencty care will certainly die if a female physician was on guard during the night shift ...

Once again, where is our freedom ? For a gloomy and medieval religion, but always the same one !

- Wether we like it or not, demands have been made to force school caterings to serve "hallal" meat to muslim children. Before the number of muslims in France became too important, the school was THE place of integration for everybody, and served all kinds of food, to all pupils. And the little Jewish children just pushed away the pork to the edge of their plate when appropriate ...
In the case of muslims, OBLIGATIONS after the demands restrain the freedom of those who are not muslims, because both time and money have been invested in all of these demands and obligations that represent just as much time and money less for all the others.

Again, wether one likes it or not, islam wants to impose its law.
Now, according to you, what definition would best fit that behaviour ?

- When I returned to Mauritius, after a dozen years during which I hadn't traveled there, I was dismayed : this island which was a paradise on earth in the 90's has become islamic ground. With complete sound occupation : indeed at sunset, the muezzin through his microphone, decibels flying high, calls the faithful for the prayer, the volume pumped up at its maximum.

Absolutely horrible ! A genuine agression for non muslims. And, according to my knowledge, one still has the right not to be muslim in Mauritius.

What are non muslims supposed to do ? Wear headphones, close their ears ?

- Certainly. We live in democracies and everybody is free to practise his/her religion. But each and every individual also has the DUTY not to bother the others with his worship.

And on christian land, some muslim ways are not compatible with western traditions and I will refer only to the traditional throat-cutting of sheep, in the worst way possible, which is very common in our civilized counties.

- Freedom of religion is having the right to practise, not the right to censure the others, or change what pre-exists, under religious pretences.

The big sign that a muslim is " turning " and becomes dangerous is when he begins to want to change our customs, our habits, our christian traditions to impose his own.
And we will see the demands of those who are schocked and disturbed by OUR Christmas trees, OUR references to Christ, OUR crosses, OUR Bibles.
Just like this muslim politician recently elected in an American state, who did not want to swear on the Bible, but on the Qwran.

If in the islamic "democracies", republics or governments, an elected christian ( ... what an utopia ! ) could one day swear on the Bible, maybe we will be able to start to change our point of view ...

What about our own traditions and customs on islamic lands ?

When judeochristians will receive the same treatment on Islamic ground, we may maybe reconsider.
But I'm afraid that won't happen any time soon !

THUS :

Little guide for muslims that want to be integrated, appreciated and liked in our countries of very ancient christian traditions

- 1 - Let them remain as discreet as they were in small numbers. Their religion, on christian soil, will be even more accepted if it remains discreet, invisible, not exposed, in the secrecy of its own intimacy. Let them keep going on ! That is the best way. That is the best behaviour of a moderate muslim.

- 2 - Let them be aware that we are in a state of alert : if a muslim starts to demand private rights specific to his religion, that means he's leaning to proselytism. And aims at imposing the charia. This is dangerous for our democracies.

And thus let him know that we will react. It is at this point, precisely, that the limit of islam in our countries is be found.

One has to oppose them an absolute "NO", I would even suggest that this should be written in the Constitution of ALL our western countries.

As soon as there is DEMAND, there is the danger of, in the end, ISLAMIZATION.

- 3 - And if muslims can not practise their religion as they would like to, and they feel frustrated, well here is a solutiom : there exists a great number of countries, of islamic areas, where they can practise with their bottocks up in the air, without disturbing any christian for whom it is a fundamental liberty not to have to endure that spectacle. They will be able to hear their muezzin call them for the evening prayer, without being disturbed by westeners, forced to cover up teir ears with their hands or to put headphones if they do not wish to hear the muezzin. Where women are free to cover themselves up as they wish and can be beaten if they want to.

No problem ! They are free to prefer these countries.

And let those muslims leave Christian believers in western countries without them having to demand more than what they already have and that suffices them : their religion of christian peace, without them having to endure the invasive external signs of another religion that to impose itself does not hesitate in its most extreme forms to use TERROR !

- 4 - Thus, moderate muslims, you will ALWAYS be free and welcome in our christian modern western civilization, and you will be free to practise your religion MODERATELY as long as you will remain ... moderate muslims.

And, please, to show us that you do not wish to harm our western civilization, that you do not want to impose your religion instead of ours, please send us a strong signal : do not have DEMANDS, especially religious ones.

And since you are moderate muslims, as soon as a terrorist attack happens, publicly withdraw your support from radical islam, claim your disapproval and your anger with this barbaric deviation of islam.

And we will love you like human brothers ...

**************************