Showing posts with label muslim. Show all posts
Showing posts with label muslim. Show all posts

Saturday, February 19, 2011

-REVOLUTIONS DANS LE MONDE ARABE : ET APRES ?-


Un vent de chaos s'est mis à souffler et a réveillé comme par magie des populations qu'on a coutume de qualifier de fatalistes et mues uniquement par l'islam ...

Bon ! Les temps changent semble-t-il, peut-être un peu façonnés, travaillés par quelques courants, faiseurs d'évènements. Seul l'avenir nous dira à qui ça profite ... et nous aurons alors les initiateurs des opérations.
En même temps, la seule chose vraiment importante, dans le fatras d'analyses, de suppositions, de supputations, et d'incantations sur de potentielles démocraties émergeant bien sûr, par génération spontanée, de ce terreau si fertile et "libertaire" qu'est l'islam, la seule chose importante sera d'établir à travers quelle grille d'analyses on appréciera réellement le devenir de ce monde arabo musulman.


Et en particulier :


- Où en sont les droits de l'homme, de l'être humain : la Liberté individuelle, la liberté d'expression, de possession, de circulation, l'égalité de traitement, le droit à l'éducation, au travail, la sécurité ... ?


- Quelles sont les relations de ces pays avec les Etats-Unis "le grand Satan" encore symboliquement le plus grand pays de libertés qui soit ?


- Quelles sont les relations de ces pays avec Israël ? Ce point à lui tout seul sera significatif d'une réelle mutation !


- Quelle place sera faite à la liberté des femmes ? Crucial et me semble-t-il totalement improbable. Le pouvoir du mâle quasiment absolu sur la femme, je doute que les hommes de ces pays soient prêts à en céder une once. De très loin, c'est la liberté de la femme et sa reconnaissance d'être humain à part entière qui vont être l'élément le plus difficile à céder pour ces potentats domestiques absolus. Avant même Israël, ce point sera sans nul doute, le moins probable à moins d'un changement quasiment magique de la mentalité musulmane.


- Quelle place sera faite à la liberté des minorités religieuses autres que l'islam ? A voir déjà quelques accrocs notables de ce côté, j'ai déjà quelques doutes ...


Ces différents points à eux seuls constitueront les meilleur des signaux que les révolutions en terre d'islam ont réellement débouché sur une ère de Liberté. Sinon, elles ne constitueront qu'une poudre aux yeux supplémentaire, visant à cacher d'autres desseins.


L'avenir seul nous le dira !




***************************


REVOLUTIONS IN THE ARAB WORLD : WHAT NEXT ?


A wind of chaos has started to blow and has awoken -almost magically - peoples that are usually referred to as fatalistic and moved only by islam...
All right! Times are changing, at least it seems so, even if a bit engineered or directed by some event- generating streams. Only time will tell who profits from it...and then we'll really know WHO initiated the events.
But in the meantime, the only important thing amidst the bulk of analysis, assumptions, hypotheses and incantations concerning the potential democraties that will emerge, by spontaneous generation of course, from the ever fertile and "libertarian" islamic soil, the only important thing I said will be to decide through which reading frame we will really estimate the fate of the muslim arabic world.


And, particularly:


- What about human rights, the rights of the human being : individual liberty, freedom of expression, of property, of circulation, equal treatment, the right to education, to work, to security ... ?


- What are the relationships of these countries with the United States, the "Big Satan", still symbolically the most free country in the world ?


- What are the relations of these countreies with Israel ? This matter alone will be significant of a real mutation!


- What freedom will women enjoy ? This is crucial and, it seems to me, very unlikely. Near total power of the male over the female, I doubt that the men of these countries are willing to give up one inch of it. More than anything else, it's the freedom of women and their recognition as a human being as a whole that will be the most difficult to concede for these absolute domestic potentates. Even before Israel, this matter will be without doubt the most unlikely, unless a near magical change of the muslim mentality.


- What room will be given to religious minorities other than islam ? By judging from the noteworthy hitches on this particular point, I already have doubts.


Those different subjects alone will form the best of signals that the revolutions on islamic ground have really given birth to an era of Freedom. If not, they will be merely another screen of smoke, functioning to mask other goals.


Only time will tell !


***************************

Monday, May 14, 2007

ISLAM IN THE WEST






BEHAVIOUR ETIQUETTE FOR THE MODERATE MUSLIM


in order to be accepted and acceptable on Christian ground

*************************************


Consider on the one hand all the questions arising from the integration of large muslim masses in France and Europe, and the subsequent difficulties that ensue. On the other hand, envision a recent interview of a muslim woman on Fox news, wearing her islamic scarf quite obviously and demanding, loud and clear, quite cleverly by the way, in front of my dear Bill O'Reilly, some additional acommodations "due" to muslims in order for them to practise their religion. This has made me reflect and ask myself some questions :

- How are so-called moderate muslims doing, when they only represent a VERY SMALL COMMUNITY in a western country, I mean a country with a western civilization and a christian religion ?

- How do they live ? How do they practise their religion ?

ANSWER : We do not see them, nor hear them, they create no turmoil, they are embedded in the population. They live and probably follow the precepts of their religion without anyone even noticing.
No difference with other religious group.

And this should become THE modele, and I would even say the absolute modele of muslim behaviour in our christian lands.
And I really do think that herein lies the key factor regarding our possibilities and our limits, as western countries, to border on or to cohabit with muslims can be found AT THAT POINT EXACTLY and nowhere else.

However, this is not what happens. And why ?

- On the one hand, we have a religion with an expansionist and conquering goal. Nobody will contradict me if I state that "basic" islam - and not only islamism - has one goal : spreading itself, vanquishing, and thus in the end establishing itself instead of the other religions. Whatever the means used !
- On the other hand, our western countries where those muslims come to live, United States, Europe, Canada, Australia ... are traditionnally Chistian countries.

- On the one side, in muslim countries, it is obvious that islam not only implies and imposes precepts for life but also intermingles with the political system itself, with the "charia" becoming the law for every muslim.
There, religion, foundation of private, public and political life itself invades all and search to expand EVERYWHERE. Proselyte by definition
- On the western side, the Christian countries are endowed with very specific values, like morals, frankness, respect for life, love of others, progress ... etc. And on these christian values, democratic and republican values have been grafted much more recently, all consistent with christian values. But religion isn't ruling our countries.


And what happens as soon as muslims reach an important number - I would even say a sufficient number ?


As soon as critical mass is reached to start occupying the terrain, the physical, visual, sound, media and other spaces ( all means being used ), one starts to notice an extremely important sign that one must be able to disclose, to be aware of in order to be able to thwart it. And this essential and important sign is DEMANDS.

More and more numerous they tend to change our traditional values to impose their own on us.
At that point : WARNING - DANGER !


THE DEMANDS


They are of different kinds but all depend on a first magician's trick :

The freedom of practising one's religion for some, becomes the DUTY for all the others .


Because EXPOSED practice of islam is a basic way to occupy the ground. Whatever the consequences may be, even if it's to the detriment of the customs, habits, conventions and traditions of the local, basic and major populations of our free countries.

No problem ! Islam uses the freedom of our countries by drawing on all the possible arsenal that our dearly gained liberties give them the possibility to do.

This finally brings about an islam that develops, grows and multiplies itself quietly on the fertile compost of our liberties, but - for there is a but - : our own freedom to be hindered or chocked by certain practices of conquering islam is completely conjured away, denied. It becomes a mere background and this freedom to feel offended by islam, which is also one of our fundamental rights, diminishes and melts like snow in the sun little by little and unnoticed.

But what is really happening ?

- Wether we like it or not, we begin to notice the appearance of all the external signs of the muslim faith. Right from the start we are forced to view muslim women with -at first- a scarf on their heads, which becomes slightly larger and longer to finally completely cover their face ... These are all HIGHLY VISIBLE signs of adherence to islam ( and a very powerful symbol of the obligation for women to hide, to globally remain pure and not represent any temptation for men : in our free countries that intent to remain so, women are not treated that way and that is nobody else's business, after all, many of our dearly liberties having been gained at a high cost ... )

Why would our freedom to not have to look at these symbols of women that we do not recognize as belonging to our western values, not be recognized ?

We are allowed to be schocked by these obscurantism ways.

- Wether we like it or not, demands for worship or praying places, foot bathing, or the possibility to pray in the middle of the street is another urgent muslim demand. When entire streets in Marseille ( a city of the South of France ) are filled with muslims with their buttocks up in the air, busy praying in direction of Mecca, I'm sorry but that's spectacle that might not be what christians want to see the most. All these people, when they exist in small numbers, do not wash their feet on their job site, and do not pray with their bottocks up in the air, in the middle of the street. They wash their feet but at home. They pray but at home. Why then, when they become more numerous, do they suddenly feel the urge to pray out of their homes, to show they are praying ?

And why should our FREEDOM to not be bothered by this behaviour - that in no way corresponds to whatsoever in our culture, our habits, our traditions - not be as important as their RIGHT to practise ?

- Wether we like it or not, demands in France have started to appear concerning special operating hours of public spaces ( like swimming pools and other ), reserved for women. Why would something that was very costly to gain, i.e. the equality of treatment for both genders, be offered to one particular minority only ? What do men do if they want to swim at that time ? For a religious reason, the social rights of all citizen are being denigrated.

Freedom for the autochtons, where have you gone ? And for the RIGHTS of one and only religion, always the same one !

- Wether we like it or not, there are demands for female physicians reserved for female patients, and male physicians for men patients only. Why not truncated teachings ? what else is next ? Why not diplomas for men and diplomas for women too ?

In France, male physicians who treat female muslims patients are often threatened and risk dying at the hand of muslim husbands enraged because the physician dared touch their wife.

Where's our freedom in all that ? All for a religion so oppressive and that wants to dominate.Thus die our liberties a bit more.

- Wether we like it or not, demands have been made in France for the prohibition of ( females ) medical students to treat male patients : thus a man needing emergencty care will certainly die if a female physician was on guard during the night shift ...

Once again, where is our freedom ? For a gloomy and medieval religion, but always the same one !

- Wether we like it or not, demands have been made to force school caterings to serve "hallal" meat to muslim children. Before the number of muslims in France became too important, the school was THE place of integration for everybody, and served all kinds of food, to all pupils. And the little Jewish children just pushed away the pork to the edge of their plate when appropriate ...
In the case of muslims, OBLIGATIONS after the demands restrain the freedom of those who are not muslims, because both time and money have been invested in all of these demands and obligations that represent just as much time and money less for all the others.

Again, wether one likes it or not, islam wants to impose its law.
Now, according to you, what definition would best fit that behaviour ?

- When I returned to Mauritius, after a dozen years during which I hadn't traveled there, I was dismayed : this island which was a paradise on earth in the 90's has become islamic ground. With complete sound occupation : indeed at sunset, the muezzin through his microphone, decibels flying high, calls the faithful for the prayer, the volume pumped up at its maximum.

Absolutely horrible ! A genuine agression for non muslims. And, according to my knowledge, one still has the right not to be muslim in Mauritius.

What are non muslims supposed to do ? Wear headphones, close their ears ?

- Certainly. We live in democracies and everybody is free to practise his/her religion. But each and every individual also has the DUTY not to bother the others with his worship.

And on christian land, some muslim ways are not compatible with western traditions and I will refer only to the traditional throat-cutting of sheep, in the worst way possible, which is very common in our civilized counties.

- Freedom of religion is having the right to practise, not the right to censure the others, or change what pre-exists, under religious pretences.

The big sign that a muslim is " turning " and becomes dangerous is when he begins to want to change our customs, our habits, our christian traditions to impose his own.
And we will see the demands of those who are schocked and disturbed by OUR Christmas trees, OUR references to Christ, OUR crosses, OUR Bibles.
Just like this muslim politician recently elected in an American state, who did not want to swear on the Bible, but on the Qwran.

If in the islamic "democracies", republics or governments, an elected christian ( ... what an utopia ! ) could one day swear on the Bible, maybe we will be able to start to change our point of view ...

What about our own traditions and customs on islamic lands ?

When judeochristians will receive the same treatment on Islamic ground, we may maybe reconsider.
But I'm afraid that won't happen any time soon !

THUS :

Little guide for muslims that want to be integrated, appreciated and liked in our countries of very ancient christian traditions


- 1 - Let them remain as discreet as they were in small numbers. Their religion, on christian soil, will be even more accepted if it remains discreet, invisible, not exposed, in the secrecy of its own intimacy. Let them keep going on ! That is the best way. That is the best behaviour of a moderate muslim.

- 2 - Let them be aware that we are in a state of alert : if a muslim starts to demand private rights specific to his religion, that means he's leaning to proselytism. And aims at imposing the charia. This is dangerous for our democracies.

And thus let him know that we will react. It is at this point, precisely, that the limit of islam in our countries is be found.


One has to oppose them an absolute "NO", I would even suggest that this should be written in the Constitution of ALL our western countries.

As soon as there is DEMAND, there is the danger of, in the end, ISLAMIZATION.

- 3 - And if muslims can not practise their religion as they would like to, and they feel frustrated, well here is a solutiom : there exists a great number of countries, of islamic areas, where they can practise with their bottocks up in the air, without disturbing any christian for whom it is a fundamental liberty not to have to endure that spectacle. They will be able to hear their muezzin call them for the evening prayer, without being disturbed by westeners, forced to cover up teir ears with their hands or to put headphones if they do not wish to hear the muezzin. Where women are free to cover themselves up as they wish and can be beaten if they want to.

No problem ! They are free to prefer these countries.

And let those muslims leave Christian believers in western countries without them having to demand more than what they already have and that suffices them : their religion of christian peace, without them having to endure the invasive external signs of another religion that to impose itself does not hesitate in its most extreme forms to use TERROR !

- 4 - Thus, moderate muslims, you will ALWAYS be free and welcome in our christian modern western civilization, and you will be free to practise your religion MODERATELY as long as you will remain ... moderate muslims.

And, please, to show us that you do not wish to harm our western civilization, that you do not want to impose your religion instead of ours, please send us a strong signal : do not have DEMANDS, especially religious ones.

And since you are moderate muslims, as soon as a terrorist attack happens, publicly withdraw your support from radical islam, claim your disapproval and your anger with this barbaric deviation of islam.

And we will love you like human brothers ...


**************************

Tuesday, March 20, 2007

Interview de l'islamologue Daniel Pipes par ResilienceTV

L'islamologue Daniel Pipes, sans doute l'intellectuel le plus captivant de sa génération tant ses analyses fouillées et percutantes sur l'islam radical et la situation géostratégique mondiale tranchent avec la désinformation et l'idéologie ambiantes, répond aux questions de Résilience TV :

The islamologist Daniel Pipes, probably the most captivating intellectual figure of his generation, whose deeply researched analyses and eye-opening strikings on radical Islam and the world's geostrategic situation completely differ from the usual misinformation and the ambient ideology, answers to ResilienceTV's questions :
.
Resiliencetv :
Ne pensez-vous pas que la présence de Jane Fonda à la manifestation contre la présence des troupes américaines en Irak renforce les islamistes ? Elle aurait pu plutôt défiler devant les ambassades d'Iran et de Syrie si elle voulait vraiment la paix ...
Don't you think that Jane Fonda's presence at the demonstrations against the presence of American troops in Iraq reinforces the islamists? They could have taken place in front of Iran's or Syria's embassies if she really wanted peace...
Daniel Pipes :
Sans aucun doute, une telle action sape l'effort de guerre de son propre pays et ne peut qu'aider l'ennemi. La dernière fois que Jane Fonda l'a fait, elle a contribué à la défaite des USA au Vietnam. Elle aurait mieux dû en effet, comme vous le suggérez, aller protester devant les ambassades de Syrie ou d'Iran.
Unquestionably, those who work against their country's war effort help the enemy. When Jane Fonda did this last time, she participated in the defeat of the United States in Vietnam. She would, as you suggest, do much better protesting the Iranian or Syrian embassies


Resiliencetv :
Plus généralement, ne croyez-vous pas que la génération de Jane Fonda a échoué à faire du monde un endroit plus agréable puisque sa conception multiculturaliste et hypercritique n'a fait qu'accroître les divisions et fragiliser la démocratie comme on le voit aujourd'hui au Royaume Uni et en Hollande ?
More generally, don't you think Jane Fonda's generation failed to make the world a better place as what it advocated, multiculturalism and hypercriticism, did nothing but increase divisions and weaken democracies, as one can witness today in the United Kingdom and in the Netherlands?
Daniel Pipes :
Comme je l'ai défendu lors de mon débat avec le maire de Londres, Ken Livinstone, le mois dernier, faire en sorte que le monde devienne de plus en plus un endroit où il fasse bon vivre passe nécessairement par la défaite de l'islam radical, ce qui implique qu'il ne prospère pas grâce à un multiculturalisme de plus en plus conciliant.
As I argued in my debate with London mayor Ken Livinstone last month, the way to making the world a better place is by defeating radical Islam, not by establishing a "get-along multiculturalism"

Resiliencetv :
N'y-a-t-il pas un vaste recyclage de l'idéologie tiersmondiste dans un millénarisme catastrophiste qui se sert par ailleurs de l'islam radical comme ultime arme pour détruire le mode de vie démocratique ?
Would you say there exists a vast recycling of third world ideology in a millenium catastrophism which uses radical Islam as an ultimate weapon to destroy the democratic way of life?
Daniel Pipes :
Oui, et comme l'a écrit l'écrivain iranien Azar Nafisi dans La Nouvelle république (en février 2003), l'islam radical .." est en réalité un phénomène moderne, de la même mouture que le fascisme et le communisme qui sont nés et ont grandi également en Occident. On peut même dire qu'il s'en inspire puisqu'il en endosse désormais autant les buts, les aspirations, que les pires formes d'endoctrinement et de dogmatisme que le marxisme a emprunté au religieux. Les principaux leaders de l'islam radical sont ainsi tout autant influencés par Lénine, Sartre, Staline, Fanon, qu'ils le sont par leur Prophète ".
Yes, as the Iranian author Azar Nafisi wrote in The New Republic in February 2003, radical Islam ..."is a modern phenomenon, in the same way that fascism and communism, both products of the West, are modern. It takes its language, goals, and aspirations as much from the crassest forms of Marxism as it does from religion. Its leaders are as influenced by Lenin, Sartre, Stalin, and Fanon as they are by the Prophet."

Resiliencetv :
La montée de l'islamisme radical n'est-elle pas également liée au fait que le mode de vie démocratique est en crise ?
En un mot, le mode de vie démocratique n'est-il pas en fin de compte victime de son succès : place prépondérante des media, énorme quantité d'informations sans la réflexion qui va avec ... etc ?
Don't you think the rise of radical Islamism is linked to a crisis in the democratic way of life ? In other words, could the democratic way of life fall victim to its own success : way too important place for the media, enormous quantity of information without the corresponding analysis ?
Daniel Pipes :
La grande faiblesse de l'Occident, comme Jean-François Revel l'a déjà indiqué, quelques dizaines années auparavant, consiste en cette haine de soi qui va jusqu'à rejeter les fondations philosophiques, économiques, et politiques qui ont permis l'émergence de la civilisation occidentale.
Espérons que les porteurs d'une telle haine soient isolés et neutralisés, même s' il est à craindre qu'un tel confinement reste toujours provisoire.
The great weakness of the West, as Jean-François Revel pointed out decades ago, are those elements which hate the philosophical, economic, and political foundations of their own countries. One can only hope that this element will eventually be isolated and ignored, but this is by no means assured.

Resiliencetv :
Pensez-vous qu'il faille vraiment empêcher l'Iran de se doter de l'arme nucléaire ? Ne vaudrait-il pas mieux attendre qu'il le possède pour mieux le dénoncer ?
Do you think that it is really necessary to prevent Iran from obtaining the nuclear weapon? Wouldn't it be better to wait that it possesses it to be better able to fight it?
Daniel Pipes :
J'espère que le peuple iranien empêchera Mahmoud Ahmadinejad d'activer son programme nucléaire. Si ce n'est pas le cas, les forces armées américaines y remédieront.
I have some hope that his fellow Iranians will stop Mahmoud Ahmadinejad from proceeding with his nuclear program. If not, then it is up to the U.S. military forces to do this.

Resiliencetv :
Croyez-vous que les Palestiniens veulent vraiment un Etat vivant en bon voisinage avec Israël ? Do you believe that the Palestinians really want a state acting as a good neighbour to Israel ?
Daniel Pipes :
20% des Palestiniens semblent le vouloir, mais 80% pas du tout.
Au contraire même puisque cette vaste majorité persiste à désirer ouvertement la destruction d'Israël.

Some 20 percent of Palestinians want this but 80 percent do not. Instead, this large majority consistently and overtly makes clear its intention to eliminate Israël.


Resiliencetv :
Quel est votre philosophe préféré ?
Which is your preferred philosopher ?
Daniel Pipes :
Karl Popper.

Resiliencetv :
Vous intéressez-vous à la campagne présidentielle française ? Et si oui, qu'en pensez-vous ?
Are you interested in the French presidential campaign? And if so, what do you think about it ? Daniel Pipes :
Oui, je la suis de temps à autre.
Et ce qui m'a le plus impressionné, en particulier s'agissant de sujets qui me tiennent le plus à coeur ( politique étrangère, action des musulmans en France ), c'est bien la façon dont la plupart des leaders politiques s'ingénient à s'éloigner subrepticement de l'approche chiraquienne.
Yes, I follow it from a distance. What most impresses me is how on the issues I most intensely deal with (foreign policy, Muslims in France), both leading candidates have distanced themselves from Jacques Chirac's approach.




**************************